Saturday, June 05, 2010

Another Odd Political Inversion, Explained

One of the potential space shuttle replacements, SpaceX's Falcon 9, successfully completed its first major test flight on Friday. You'll recall that SpaceX is one of several companies vying for lucrative government contracts literally to do the "heavy lifting" for the space program, including supplying the International Space Station.

There have been a lot of vocal opinions on the decision to privatize the single most critical aspect of NASA's operations, with luminaries no less than Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin coming down with equal passion on opposite sides of the issue. This latest milestone on the road to privatized spacefaring, however, brings with it a slew of politicians weighing in on the policy as it goes forward.

And here's the weird thing: Republicans hate it, and Democrats love it.

And this is totally backwards.

Republicans are for small government, right? They hate the NSF, the NEA, and all those other government programs that waste taxpayer money on things better handled by the market, right? So why would they be in favor of continued government involvement in a program as notoriously overrun by cost as NASA, especially when the market is showing that it's ready to step up with potential solutions? And Democrats, conversely, would seem to want the government to be in control of something as important as human space exploration.

And this inversion has bugged me ever since the story hit, but I think I've figured it out.

Republicans support NASA out of Cold War defense-spending mentality, and never mind that the really cool military space stuff (like the X-37B) is being done directly under military auspices now. The same knee-jerk reaction that gets DARPA and Pentagon projects effectively infinite funding leads the Republicans by and large to support continued government sponsorship of NASA.

Democrats, on the other hand, have always thought that NASA is a giant waste of money that could be spent on social infrastructure, and that makes supporting privatization a win-win scenario. Either free market ideology will pan out and the government will get a decent space program at less cost, or the whole thing will be an abysmal failure and a Democratic government can quietly eviscerate or altogether ditch the space program.

Stupid schizoid politics.

EDIT: Here's an article I found on other contenders for privatizing space travel.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home